BALTIMORE, MARYLAND (December 1, 2020) — today, Firearms coverage Coalition (FPC) announced the submitting of a brand new federal second change lawsuit that seeks to strike down the State of Maryand’s ban on so-known as “assault weapons,” palms that are constitutionally included under the 2nd modification. The case, Bianchi, et al. v. Frosh, et al., can also be discovered at

becoming a member of FPC are 3 individuals, licensed firearms retailer box merchants, the 2d change basis (SAF), and the citizens Committee for the correct to keep and endure arms (CCRKBA). The plaintiffs are represented by way of attorneys Nicole J. Moss, John D. Ohlendorf, Peter A. Patterson, and David H. Thompson of Cooper & Kirk, Raymond M. DiGuiseppe, and FPC Director of felony method Adam Kraut. Defendants include Maryland attorney familiar Brian Frosh, Col. Woodrow W. Jones III, the Secretary of State Police, R. Jay Fisher is Sheriff of Baltimore County, and Jim Fredericks is Sheriff of Anne Arundel County.

All “people who are legally eligible to own and acquire firearms, have a fundamental, constitutionally certain right to hold standard firearms for protection of self and household and for different lawful routine,” the plaintiffs’ criticism says. “but the State of Maryland has criminalized the possession and transportation of commonplace firearms by means of normal citizens, making it completely illegal for legislation-abiding residents to pastime their basic correct to hold and endure such arms.” 

be part of or DONATE & help THIS AND other situations!

The plaintiffs mentioned that “the effect they are searching for is contrary to Kolbe v. Hogan,” a 2017 en banc choice of the Fourth Circuit court docket of Appeals. but, they say, “that case was wrongly decided. They hence institute this litigation to vindicate their second change rights and to are trying to find to have Kolbe overruled.”

“In Heller and McDonald, the Supreme court validated that the second change ensures an individual correct to own generally owned firearms,” explained Pete Patterson of Cooper & Kirk. “regardless of this assure, Maryland bans its citizens from possessing one of the crucial most everyday firearms in the Nation. This ban is blatantly unconstitutional, and we’re bringing this go well with to correct faulty precedent to the contrary.” 

“The constitutional rights at stake here are simple in nature, and Maryland’s laws cannot stand up to Heller’s specific analysis or any form of heightened scrutiny,” mentioned Ray DiGuiseppe. “It isn’t any reply to say that it is permissible to ban these usual palms so long as the possession of alternative firearms is allowed. All legislation-abiding adults have the appropriate to purchase and possess the firearms the State prohibits under its laws, and we are able to work to fix that appropriate during this case.”

“So-known as ‘assault weapons’ are one of the crucial most frequently owned semi-automated firearms, all of which can be fantastic for self-defense,” defined FPC’s Adam Kraut. “Maryland’s ban on these firearms robs its residents of their appropriate to opt for, forcing them to purchase and use firearms that may additionally no longer be what’s most efficient for them, including defending their buildings and their households. All legislation-abiding adults have a constitutional correct to buy any of the semi-computerized firearms in the marketplace these days. Maryland’s legal guidelines are unconstitutional and we look forward to vindicating the rights of our purchasers and all individuals in Maryland and throughout the united states during this case and others.”

“beneath the textual content of the constitution itself, now not to mention the Supreme court’s precedents, the plaintiffs and all legislation-abiding people have a correct to hold and bear these standard semi-automated arms for all lawful purposes,” mentioned FPC President Brandon Combs. “via this case,  our Miller v. Becerra litigation, and others, we are able to proceed to combat ahead and fix the whole scope of second change rights all over the united states.”

Firearms coverage Coalition and its FPC law are the nation’s subsequent-era advocates main the 2d change litigation house, having these days filed several fundamental federal second modification complaints including challenges to the State of Pennsylvania’s and Allegheny County’s carry restrictions (Cowey v. Mullen), Philadelphia’s Gun permit Unit policies and practices (Fetsurka v. Outlaw), Pennsylvania’s ban on raise by using adults under 21 years of age (Lara v. Evanchick), California’s Handgun Ban and “Roster” legal guidelines (Renna v. Becerra), Maryland’s lift ban (call v. Jones), New Jersey’s lift ban (Bennett v. Davis), ny city’s carry ban (Greco v. big apple metropolis), the federal ban on the sale of handguns and handgun ammunition with the aid of federal firearm licensees (FFLs) to adults under 21 years of age (Reese v. BATFE), and others, with many greater instances being organized these days. To comply with these and other felony situations FPC is actively engaged on, discuss with the felony motion section of FPC’s web site or observe FPC on Instagram, Twitter, facebook, YouTube.

The Bianchi case is one more vital lawsuit filed as a part of FPC’s complete strategy to defend freedom, strengthen individual liberty, and restore the charter and its ensures for individuals right through the us. individuals who need to support the lawsuit can do so at and

observe — advantage PLAINTIFFS vital!

FPC is urgently seeking particular person and FFL plaintiffs for a couple of complaints which are being prepared to challenge legal guidelines and policies that infringe on simple rights, together with (however now not limited to):

  • legal guidelines and policies that avoid people from purchasing and/or possessing so-called “assault weapons” (semi-automated firearms with general qualities) and “excessive-potential” magazines (common magazines that grasp more than 10 rounds)
  • legal guidelines and guidelines that stay away from 18-20-year-historic younger adults (under age 21) from obtaining handguns from FFLs and elevate loaded, operable palms in public for self-protection
  • laws and policies that keep away from particular person adults (over the age of 18) from carrying loaded handguns and different fingers outside of their domestic
  • legal guidelines and policies that stay away from individuals from buying and/or possessing handguns and other palms without first buying a “purchase let” 
  • laws and guidelines that steer clear of people from buying or possessing firearms because of a conviction for a non-violent crime, or intellectual fitness adjudication that did not involve an involuntary dedication  
  • laws that prevent honorably discharged veterans from acquiring or possessing firearms as a result of they have got been classified as “a mental defective” as a result of the agency’s determination that they “lack the intellectual means to contract or manage his or her own affairs” as a result of they need advice managing VA merits and have a fiduciary

If somebody you know meets the criteria above, or in case you can be interested in collaborating in litigation as a aiding FFL, please contact us:

if you want to support FPC’s Bianchi case and many different pro-second change complaints, legal motion, and research, please chip in $5, $10, $25, or anything that you may at or be a part of the FPC Grassroots military at

Firearms coverage Coalition ( is a 501(c)4 nonprofit organization. FPC’s mission is to protect and safeguard constitutional rights—above all the right to hold and undergo fingers—increase particular person liberty, and repair freedom through litigation and felony motion, legislative and regulatory action, schooling, outreach, grassroots activism, different programs. FPC legislations is the nation’s largest public hobby felony team focused on 2nd modification and adjoining simple rights including freedom of speech and due system, conducting litigation, research, scholarly publications, and amicus briefing, among different efforts.