Trump Says Supreme court ‘Incompetent and susceptible’ Over Election Fraud

President Donald Trump observed that the U.S. Supreme courtroom failed to handle large election fraud adequately.

“The U.S. Supreme court docket has been completely incompetent and vulnerable on the large Election Fraud that took place within the 2020 Presidential Election,” he wrote in a Twitter post on Saturday morning.

“we have absolute PROOF, but they don’t need to see it—No ‘standing’, they say. If we have corrupt elections, we have no nation!” he introduced.

The Supreme courtroom didn’t instantly reply to a request for remark from The Epoch times.

Supreme court Justices (L-R) Brett Kavanaugh, Amy Coney Barrett, Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito. (credit L-R: Brendan Smialowski, Greg Nash, Mandel Ngan/AFP by way of Getty pictures)
recently, several moves made by the united states’s maximum court frustrated the president and his allies.

The Supreme court—with 5 conservative justices and three of them appointed by Trump—rejected Texas’s bid to challenge the 2020 election results in four battleground states.

In a Dec. 11 order, the justices denied Texas’s request to sue Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin, opining that the Lone celebrity State lacked criminal standing—or capacity—to sue beneath the constitution since it has now not shown a legitimate interest to intervene in how different states tackle their elections.

“Texas has no longer demonstrated a judicially cognizable pastime within the method by which one other State conducts its elections,” the order (pdf) read. “All other pending motions are pushed aside as moot.”

The case has been considered through the Trump crusade and a few Republicans as a case with big knowledge.

“The Supreme court docket basically let us down. No wisdom, No braveness!” Trump took on Twitter on Dec. 12 to categorical his frustration over the determination.

In an extra election-linked case, the court set a time limit two days after the presidential inauguration day showing curiously no interest to take significant action about the alleged election fraud.

The Trump crusade filed the go well with on Dec. 21 difficult three Pennsylvania Supreme court rulings that “illegally changed” the mail-in polllaws “immediately before and after the 2020 presidential election.” Trump’s criminal group argued that those court docket choices had been issued in violation of Article II of the charter and the U.S. Supreme court docket ruling, Bush v. Gore, that settled a recount dispute from Florida in 2000.

along with the petition for a writ of certiorari, the legal crew filed a request to the court to expedite the case inquiring for the nation’s properly courtroom to order Pennsylvania officers to reply via noon on Dec. 23.

despite the fact, the Supreme court docketed the case on Dec. 23 devoid of immediately acting on the request to expedite the case. as an alternative, the docket shows a Jan. 22 cut-off date for Pennsylvania to reply to the petition, two days after Inauguration Day.

The Trump campaign has during the last seven weeks provided facts alleging balloting irregularities and fraud together with advantageous Republican poll staring at blocked by using election officers, votes being forged in the names of deceased men and women, and election-connected guidelines being changed bypassing the state legislatures.

because of the courts in general failing to handle alleged election fraud, the president urged americans to “cease the theft of the presidential election” in a video message to the nation on Dec. 22.

“americans should be capable of have complete religion in the confidence of their elections. The destiny of our democracy is determined by it,” he pointed out. “now could be the time for the American people to elevate their voices and demand that this injustice be immediately corrected. Our elections ought to be reasonable, they should be sincere, they have to be transparent, and that they must be 100 percent freed from fraud.”

examine greater:

My recommendations:

With three contributors of the Supreme court having been nominated via Trump, I discover it unthinkable that they won’t back him up, with all of those election frauds having been witnessed, and video proof having been viewed.